ROLL UP !!! ROLL UP !!! TIME TO MOVE ON !!!

June 6, 2016

“WELCOME TO THE UNKNOWN”

>>> THE CLEANER <<<

Category : THE MERGE

Tags : THE MERGE

← WORMWOOD SYSTEMS OBSERVATION : THAT IS NOT THE SUN !!! MY RED KACHINA

FREEDOM BY PHARRELL WILLIAMS →

27 thoughts on “ROLL UP !!! ROLL UP !!! TIME TO MOVE ON !!!”

THOMAS on June 7, 2016 at 1:40 am said:

LikeLike

Reply ↓

Michelle A on June 7, 2016 at 2:05 am said:

LOL…a dung beetle. The scarab. Rolling his dung to make the new generation. Thanks for the chuckle Hatter.

LikeLiked by 2 people

Reply ↓

jenny krieser on June 7, 2016 at 2:13 am said:

Feels just fine …so far… lol … 🙂

LikeLiked by 2 people

Reply ↓

THOMAS on June 7, 2016 at 12:24 pm said:

LikeLike

Reply ↓

ann.marie on June 7, 2016 at 1:54 pm said:

Coordinated streams of Light emanate from above and below
by ÉirePort

Coordinated streams of Light emanate from above and below.

Mortifications are cancelled.

Stearic callouses are removed.

Barterings are no more.

ÉirePort | June 7, 2016 at 11:11

*ann.marie:..definitions./oxford/wiki…

Stearic… definition, of or relating to suet or fat.

Mortification… definition, a feeling of humiliation or shame

LikeLike

Reply ↓

ann.marie on June 7, 2016 at 2:02 pm said:

Relating.to.GaiaPortal..of.June.7th.2016…Interesting.take.on.mortification…Wiki…
Mortification of the flesh is the institutional expiatory act of a person or group’s
penance for atonement of sins and path to sanctity. The term is primarily used in
religious and spiritual contexts. The practice is found in many cultures, most notably
the Roman Catholic Church and their penitential saints. The more common forms of
mortification today include fasting, walking barefoot, motion by pious kneeling or lying
face down on the floor. Also common among religious orders in the past were the
wearing of sack garments, and flagellation in imitation of Jesus of Nazareth’s suffering
and death by crucifixion. Some forms unique to some Asian cultures are carrying
heavy loads and immersion in water.

LikeLike

Reply ↓
- THOMAS on June 7, 2016 at 4:51 pm said:
  
  IT MEANS GET YER DRIVIN GLOVES ON SHORTY.WE GOT A LONG WAYS TA GO AND A SHORT IME TO GET THERE……OH WE’RE EASTBOUND RUN ON BANDIT RUN
  
  LikeLike
- SAM on June 7, 2016 at 5:27 pm said:
  
  From: Online Etymology dictionary because your comment made me think about the root word “mort”, as in “mortuary or mortician”, so there must be more to it than “meets the eye”. IMHO, this is closer to what Eireport meant. Because the ancient meaning of “mort” meant death, killing, later in 1640 changed definition to merely mean “feeling of humiliation”.
  
  mortification (n.) Look up mortification at Dictionary.com
  late 14c., “mortifying the flesh, suppression of bodily desires,” from Late Latin mortificationem (nominative mortificatio) “a killing, putting to death,” from past participle stem of mortificare (see mortify). Sense of “feeling of humiliation” first recorded 1640s.
  mortified (adj.) Look up mortified at Dictionary.com
  “deeply humiliated,” 1717, past participle adjective from mortify.
  mortify (v.) Look up mortify at Dictionary.com
  late 14c., “to kill,” from Old French mortefiier “destroy, overwhelm, punish,” from Late Latin mortificare “cause death, kill, put to death,” literally “make dead,” from mortificus “producing death,” from Latin mors (genitive mortis) “death” (see mortal (adj.)) + root of facere “to make” (see factitious). Religious sense of “to subdue the flesh by abstinence and discipline” first attested early 15c. Sense of “humiliate” first recorded 1690s (compare mortification). Related: Mortified; mortifying.
  
  Also found this “interesting”
  mortgage (n.) Look up mortgage at Dictionary.com
  late 14c., morgage, “conveyance of property as security for a loan or agreement,” from Old French morgage (13c.), mort gaige, literally “dead pledge” (replaced in modern French by hypothèque), from mort “dead” (see mortal (adj.)) + gage “pledge” (see wage (n.)). So called because the deal dies either when the debt is paid or when payment fails. Old French mort is from Vulgar Latin *mortus “dead,” from Latin mortuus, past participle of mori “to die” (see mortal (adj.)). The -t- restored in English based on Latin.
  see how they used languages to change definitions/meanings and spellings.
  
  Good Work, Anne Marie!!! Let’s keep hammering them
  mortifications (death/killing) are cancelled..
  
  barterings (?? as in bartering and exchanging souls/source spark/looshing/mind swiping) are no more.
  
  Stearic is “fat renderings solidified. and the definition of callous:
  Definitions
  WordNet 3.6
  adj callous emotionally hardened “a callous indifference to suffering”,”cold-blooded and indurate to public opinion”
  adj callous having calluses; having skin made tough and thick through wear “calloused skin”,”with a workman’s callous hands”
  v callous make insensitive or callous; deaden feelings or morals
  ***
  Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary
  
  stearic callouses are removed
  
  LikeLiked by 1 person
- ann.marie on June 7, 2016 at 6:14 pm said:
  
  @Sam…excellent!…(smile)…<3
  
  LikeLike
- Michelle A on June 7, 2016 at 11:31 pm said:
  
  I was just reading an interpretation of the Gaia Portal for 6/7. This was by Justin at Sitshow http://sitsshow.blogspot.com/2016/06/Gaia-Portal-June-7th-2016-Coordinated-streams-of-Light-emanate-from-above-and-below-with-interpretations-by-Justin.html
  
  His interpretation of the mortification and stearic were interesting in he feels mortification refers to an embarrassment of self and our human bodies and functions. Stearic in his opinion refers to a hardening of fat, like in soap, which makes the embarrassment of self “hardened” in the system so any personal trauma stays and becomes an automatic defense. This is how he combined the statements. The knee jerk response from shame as self defense is not needed. Then the bartering he sees as no longer a this-for-that idea but instead looking at the mutual benefit of working together.
  Like I said, this is not my interpretation it is Justin’s but an interesting take that I wanted to share.
  
  LikeLike
- ann.marie on June 7, 2016 at 11:54 pm said:
  
  @Michele.A…I.was.raised.Catholic…we.had.to.confess.our.sins…which.to.me,even.as.a
  young.child
  was.embarassing/shameful…I.thought.my.previous.definition.of.Mortification.of.the.Flesh
  was.applicable…
  and.ties.in.with.what.you’re.saying…(mortification refers to an embarrassment of self and our human bodies and functions.)…Sam.focused.more.on.Mortis…Death/killling;.however,it.is.a.killing.of.the.spirit…yes?
  …I.am.thinking…you.are.spot.on!…
  And…the.”fat”.part…really.reminded.me.of.Rose.and.the.spiritual.fat…(smile)…<3
  
  LikeLike
- Michelle A on June 8, 2016 at 7:24 am said:
  
  @ann.marie… I was raised lutheran so it is close. We need to be willing to walk away from that conditioning that tells us ‘we are bad if we…’ and there are thousands of reasons to fill in the blank. IMO… no baby is born bad and as adults if we lead a good life that helps more than hurts others, we are trying to do right. Know you are appreciated, know you are loved. this group is a good one and I feel many are having similar issues. No birth is painless. This is a birth of the new us. Head held high and NO FEAR. 🙂 ❤
  
  LikeLike

Alexandra on June 7, 2016 at 4:01 pm said:

How appropriate, Hatter…… a dung beetle…:-)))

LikeLiked by 1 person

Reply ↓

Pingback: ROLL UP !!! ROLL UP !!! TIME TO MOVE ON !!! — OUT OF THIS WORLDX – ronaldwederfoort

Gemini on June 7, 2016 at 7:12 pm said:

cancellation – Legal Definition. n. The act, or the marks or perforations made in the act, of canceling something. A remedy by which a court calls in, annuls, and retains possession of a void or rescinded written legal document because it may cause unnecessary litigation or make a person’s title to property unclear.

LikeLike

Reply ↓

SAM on June 7, 2016 at 7:50 pm said:

Thanks Gemini…just the mere fact that we are re searching and posting with hardcore facts, is draining “their” so called power over us. Source spark guided…we mirror/reflect “their” “words/spellings/definitions back at them!!! Thanks for joining in!!! 6/9/2016 ritual=6/9/9, Let’s blast them. for everyone, search etymology or ancient biblical meaning of “then the word, always best to start with the root spelling or the “PREFIX” how appropriate that “they” taught” us that…..PREFIX, part of implied consent, seems evident to me.

LikeLike

Reply ↓
- Gemini on June 7, 2016 at 10:35 pm said:
  
  I intend this definition of mortification below……
  
  LikeLike
Gemini on June 7, 2016 at 10:44 pm said:

I intend this definition of Cancellation above….

I intend ALL so called debt….Mortgages,rents, leases, loans, student loans, car loans, utility bills, taxes of all type ect…..CANCELLED

ALL Domicil where they BE……Every moment of NOW

LikeLike

Reply ↓

Gemini on June 7, 2016 at 7:25 pm said:

n mortification In Scots law, lands given formerly to the church for religious purposes, or since the Reformation for charitable or public uses. By the present practice, when lands are given for any charitable purpose, they are usually disponed to trustees, to be held either blench or in feu.

LikeLike

Reply ↓

Gemini on June 7, 2016 at 8:08 pm said:

I do not consent to implied or tacit consent…..

Just state it Sam and intend it……done…!!!

LikeLike

Reply ↓
- SAM on June 7, 2016 at 8:53 pm said:
  
  thanks gemini, not that easy, we can intend, but “they” have used words/spellings/definitions, to such an extent, not to have any liability/responsibiity/accountability. From what I see, three is a midddleman, AI, that “defines” based upon old codings, “they” severed the connection and then reprogrammed it, just like us. It does not understand our words/spellings. Just like I cannot translate the russian language. all done purposefully, there was a universal “language” at one time, that was non-verbal, it was telephatic (at least that is the term “they” gave us) It was not “telepathic” it was inner standing…just search the meaning of pathic…
  Word Origin and History for -pathic Expand
  word-forming element from Latin pathicus, from Greek pathikos “suffering, remaining passive,” from pathein “to suffer” (see pathos ).
  We just accepted these words/spellings
  they have f’ed with the words/spellings/definitions so much, that AI does not understand our innerstand. ‘It” does not understand our language, e do not (k)now what was programmed
  I will attach this (hopefulley) so poorly defined This intermediator, is a computer, it has no imagination only ac(k)nowledges what is is fed…that is all I can say…like I said before, call me crazy
  
  LikeLike
- SAM on June 7, 2016 at 8:55 pm said:
  
  Sorry, forgot to attach
  intend (v.) Look up intend at Dictionary.com
  c. 1300, entenden, “direct one’s attention to, pay attention, give heed,” from Old French entendre, intendre “to direct one’s attention” (in Modern French principally “to hear”), from Latin intendere “turn one’s attention, strain (in quest of something), be zealous,” literally “stretch out, extend,” from in- “toward” (see in- (2)) + tendere “to stretch” (see tenet).
  
  Sense of “have as a plan, have in mind or purpose” (late 14c.) was present in Latin. A Germanic word for this was ettle, from Old Norse ætla “to think, conjecture, propose,” from Proto-Germanic *ahta “consideration, attention” (source also of Old English eaht, German acht). Related: Intended; intending.
  
  LikeLike

SAM on June 7, 2016 at 7:31 pm said:

@ ann.marie…put my response in error under thomas’s post, thanks for bringing that to “spark light”. These “entitiies” fraudently made up contracts/maritime rule/etc, all nothing but an illusion and nothing but rubbish!!!. Soul/soul spark “con tracts”. I know this is hard for us to follow or interpret (as “they” designed it). But please read and reread, this comes from the website
Contract | Jewish Virtual Library
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/…/ejud_0002_0005...
I am attaching just some, which I bolded and highlighted, that helps to justify that this was all made up. It has nothing to do with religion(s), just a way to hide it in plain view. Meaning/definitions/words/spelling changed, to obfuscate “their” lies, deceit, fraud. This AI must be “educated” about the “fabrications” programmed about Source spark(s). The code/codings/keys/keystrokes must be changed. attaching the etymology of the word educate…just another word/spelling/definition, that “they” have twisted/vortexed. people may think I am crazy, but if Saturn and the moon are nothing but a huge AI facility, and if like Maid in UK says and I also believe, is fed nothing but negative portrayals of humankind Source spark, then it ASSUMES, all this is humankind based..because it only reads the data that is programmed into “it”. Just like what I have been trying to point out, words/spellings/definitions being changed, why?? because, we still have an influence on AI, if we keep using the words/spellings/definitions, “they” put in our “heads” , also changes our true intentions. Remember, this is only a computer, only bases it’s evaluation by the data that is supplied to it. ‘they” know it, so that is why “they” manipulate us…manipulation/censor/NASA..to stop any influence on AI, that “they” do not want….”they” do not want it to (k)now our true intents/visions
1) ‘Educate’ – The term education has been derived from the Latin word ‘educare’. The term ‘educare’ means ‘to bring up’, ‘to rise’, and ‘to nourish’. The child has to bring up like a plant in the garden by the teacher. His potentialities should be developed with proper care and nourishment.

Quite the opposite of what “they” are forcing on us.
We do not just communicate thru technolgies, we also communicate telepathically, that is why the chemtrails/ELF’s, etc. deliberately, blocking our input, just like in his realm. Again, it has nothing to do with religion, it is a tool that “they” hide behind.
Encyclopedia Judaica:
Contract
Issues in Jewish Ethics: Table of Contents | Pre-Marital Sex | Gambling

Print Friendly and PDF
CONTRACT (Heb. חוֹזֶה, ḥozeh), in general law theory a legally binding agreement between two or more parties, in terms of which one party undertakes for the benefit of the other to perform or refrain from a certain act. As such, contract is the main source of the law of *obligations . The scriptural term closest to this meaning is the word berit (“covenant”), although it occurs mainly in the sense of a *covenant of love between man and his neighbor (I Sam. 18:3), or a perpetual covenant between the Almighty and man or the people of Israel (Gen. 9:9; 15:18; Ex. 31:16), as well as a covenant of peace between nations (Gen. 21:32; Judg. 2:2; II Sam. 5:4; Ezek. 30:5; Hos. 12:2). The word ḥozeh also occurs in Scripture, but not in any strict legal sense: e.g., “… with the nether-world are we at agreement” (Isa. 28:15). (the In the post-scriptural period no concrete legal significance was assigned to either of these terms, nor was there any embracing parallel term for contract in talmudic timesword kiẓa(h) (Tosef. Ket. 4:7, et al.) is not a generic term for contract but represents a particular transaction only). In the rabbinical period (see *Mishpat Ivri ), the term hitkasherut came into general use – a term rightly considered by Gulak to be a translation of the Latin contractus (from contrahere, “mutual binding together”), and one that aptly expresses the concept of contract. The term ḥozeh was used by I.S. Zuri (Mishpat ha-Talmud, 5 (1921), 1) as the equivalent of contract and this has come into general use in Hebrew legal parlance in the State of Israel.
The absence in Jewish law of a generic term for a concept paralleling that of contract in Roman law is apparently attributable to its preference for a concrete rather than abstract terminology (see *Codification of Law ). The Jewish law principles of contract are to be gathered from the various laws of *sale , *lease , *gift ,*loan , *suretyship , etc. and from the additional special laws accruing in the course of time.
Creation of Contractual Ties
In ancient Jewish law it was possible for contractual ties to be created in various symbolic ways, such as by “removing and handing over the shoe” (Ruth 4:7; see also TJ, Kid. 1:5, 60c) and by handshake (teki’at kaf, Prov. 6:1; 11:15; 17:18; 22:26; Job 17:3; see also Ezra 10: 19). The view of obligations as being of a concrete (ḥefzi) nature by giving the creditor a *lien over the debtor’s assets (see Obligations, Law of) resulted in the fact that the modes of creating contractual obligations came to be the same as those for the creation of ownership rights in property (see Modes of *Acquisition ). While Jewish law bases the conclusion of a contract on the gemirut ha-da’at (i.e., final intention or making up of the mind) of the parties to be bound, such intention may only be inferred from a formal and recognized kinyan (“mode of acquisition”) executed by one of the parties. Hence, contrary to Roman law which allows for a contract to be concluded by the mere oral assent of the parties, Jewish law does not generally confer legal recognition on an obligation created merely orally (BM 94a; cf. Kid. 1:6; for exceptions to this rule, see below). Accordingly, the breach of a merely oral agreement involves “a breach of faith,” carrying only moral sanction (BM 49a, opinion of R. Johanan, and Codes); and the obligation is not legally complete, even where the purchaser has paid the price but failed to observe the mode of acquisition proper to the transaction, and the sanction, if he should retract, is a “religious” one only: “He who punished the generation of the Flood and of the Dispersion will exact payment from one who does not stand by his word” (BM 4:2 and Codes). The reason for the existence of a religious or moral sanction in these circumstances is the underlying religio-moral duty of fulfilling a promise, i.e., an oral undertaking made without the execution of a formal kinyan (Ket. 86a; see also BM 9:7 and Pes. 91a).
Consideration
Jewish law attaches a great deal of importance to the existence of consideration in the creation of contractual ties, and in this respect shows an interesting similarity to English law (see Gulak, Yesodei, 2 (1922), 40ff.). This requirement finds expression mainly in the fact that the contract is only concluded upon the actual passing of the consideration, such as the borrower’s receipt of the loan money, or the performance of an act representing the receipt of the subject matter of the transaction by the purchaser, donee, hirer, or borrower. Even with regard to the creation of a bailment, which gives the bailee no right in the property itself or its fruits, it was laid down that an act of meshikhah (lit. “pulling,” see Modes of *Acquisition ) of the subject matter established the obligation (BM 99a; see *shomerim ). Similarly, a contract of *partnership for profit-making purposes is concluded when each of the partners performs an act of receiving part of the subject matter of the partnership belonging to the other partners – whether in money or chattels (Ket. 10:4) – the rule being: “partners acquire one from the other a common interest in the partnership capital in the same manners that the purchaser acquires [from the seller]” (Maim. Yad, Sheluḥin, 4:1). In the same way, a contract for the hire of a laborer is concluded upon the laborer commencing his work, the work being the contractual consideration (Tosef. BM, 7:1; BM 76b). None of the obligations normally deriving from any of the above-mentioned transactions, such as payment of the price by the purchaser and the seller’s responsibility for the subject matter, or payment of the bailment money by the bailor and the obligation of the bailee to take care of the bailment, etc., will be legally binding on any of the parties, except upon their execution of the act of kinyan offering some exchange of consideration.
A number of contractual obligations were originally capable of being established merely orally – these cases being explained on the basis of a “spiritual” consideration. Thus, in the case of a *dowry it was decided that the mutual promises of the parties achieved legal validity upon mere oral agreement (“matters concerning which kinyan is effected by a mere verbal arrangement,” Ket. 102b); “owing to the pleasure in forming of a mutual family tie, they finally make up their minds to allow one another the full rights of kinyan.” The distribution among the partners of partnership assets by lottery, even though effected orally only, was held to be legally binding for a similar reason (BB 106b). Similarly, the oral establishment of a suretyship obligation was justified because, “on account of the pleasure of being trusted [by the creditor, or court appointing him] he finally makes up his mind to undertake the obligation” (BB 173b, 176b).
The requirement of consideration for the creation of an obligation served to complicate the modes of formation of contractual ties, just as the need for real modes of acquisition complicated the manner of gaining a proprietary right. Beginning with the amoraic period, mention is made of “acquisition by the kerchief” (kinyan sudar) as a method both for the acquisition of a proprietary right and for the establishment of an obligation. This mode required that the promisee give the promisor some object belonging to him in return for which, as it were, the latter undertook the obligation; this procedure involved the handing over of a fictitious consideration – as the value of the object bore no relationship to the measure of the obligation and on completion of the formalities the object was returned to the promisee. Because it was convenient and easily executed, this procedure came to be widely followed from amoraic times onward as the mode of creation of different obligations (see BM 94a; BB 3a; etc.). In order to create mutual obligations between the parties, a kinyan would be effected by each in respect of his own undertaking.

LikeLike

Reply ↓

Gemini on June 7, 2016 at 7:40 pm said:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feu_(land_tenure)

LikeLike

Reply ↓

SAM on June 7, 2016 at 8:13 pm said:

@ann.marie…”they” disclosed long ago that it would be a “spiritual war” , be lie eving, that we would be so “dumbed down” by that time, we would never know how to retaliate. We mirror back at them, how meaningless/deceptive words/spellings are. How fraudulent words/spellings/definitions are and how open they are for “one’s/someone’s” INTERPRETATION…WHICH BRINGS US BACK TO “PERCEPTION”. AN INTERPRETTION OF A WORD/SPELLING IS MERELY THAT PERSON/ENTITY PERCEPTION OF THE MEANING, AND THEN DEFINED IN WRITING/RITING/WRITS/RULINGS. COMES TO MIND, THE MEME THAT THE WRITTEN WORD IS GOSPEL, MORE LIKE “THEIR” GOD SPELL.

LikeLike

Reply ↓

SAM on June 7, 2016 at 10:57 pm said:

The unnamed, will be named. for what cometh, does not come for me You cannot insert your “consonate/con sent’
consonant
[kon-suh-nuh nt]
Spell Syllables
Synonyms Examples Word Origin
See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
noun
1.
Phonetics.
(in English articulation) a speech sound produced by occluding with or without releasing (p, b; t, d; k, g), diverting (m, n, ng), or obstructing (f, v; s, z, etc.) the flow of air from the lungs (opposed to vowel ).
(in a syllable) any sound other than the sound of greatest sonority in the syllable, as b, r, and g in brig (opposed to sonant ).
Compare vowel (def 1b).
(in linguistic function) a concept empirically determined as a phonological element in structural contrast with vowel, as the b of be, the w of we, the y, s, and t of yeast, etc.
2.
a letter that usually represents a consonant sound.
adjective
3.
in agreement; agreeable; in accord; consistent (usually followed by to or with):
behavior consonant with his character.
4.
corresponding in sound, as words.
5.
harmonious, as sounds.
6.
Music. constituting a consonance.
7.
Physics. noting or pertaining to sounds exhibiting consonance.
8.
consonantal.
Origin of consonant Expand
LatinMiddle EnglishAnglo-French
1350-14001350-1400; Middle English consona (u) nt (< Anglo-French) < Latin consonant- (stem of consonāns, present participle of consonāre to sound with or together). See con-, sonant
Related forms Expand
consonantlike, adjective
consonantly, adverb
unconsonant, adjective
Synonyms Expand
See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
3. concordant, congruous, conformant.
Antonyms Expand
6. dissonant.
Dictionary.com Unabridged
Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2016.
Cite This Source
Examples from the Web for consonant Expand
Contemporary Examples
Appeals to “collective will” and the judgment of “history” are not consonant with liberal thought.

Anti-Zionism Is Still Kosher
Jerry Haber
October 23, 2012
Romney's teenage bullying hurts him because it is consonant with his adult record.

Paul Begala on Romney: Once a Bully, Always a Bully
Paul Begala
May 10, 2012
Historical Examples
We can say what we like, do what we like, so long as it is consonant with the public good.

The Blue Tower
Evelyn E. Smith
They were consonant with early Roman mores which were warlike.

Folkways
William Graham Sumner
Worship and sacrifice, as mere acts toward supernatural beings, may be consonant with any number of lapses in conduct.

Pioneers of Evolution from Thales to Huxley
Edward Clodd
In a rigorous and abstract sense, the consonant has no sound of its own.

The Continental Monthly, Vol 6, No 5, November 1864
Various
Now this sound goes from the highest to the lowest of the Italian vowels, beginning with the consonant m.

Guide to the Kindergarten and Intermediate Class and Moral Culture of Infancy.
Elizabeth P. Peabody
I is a consonant when it represents the consonant y, as in alien.

Orthography
Elmer W. Cavins
He shews that the name was of Egyptian original, at least consonant to the language of Egypt; for it was the same as the Nile.

A New System; or, an Analysis of Antient Mythology. Volume II. (of VI.)
Jacob Bryant
Ah, but who determines what is consonant with the public good?

The Blue Tower
Evelyn E. Smith

British Dictionary definitions for consonant Expand
consonant
/ˈkɒnsənənt/
noun
1.
a speech sound or letter of the alphabet other than a vowel; a stop, fricative, or continuant
adjective
2.
(postpositive; foll by with or to) consistent; in agreement
3.
harmonious in tone or sound
4.
(music) characterized by the presence of a consonance
5.
being or relating to a consonant
Derived Forms
consonantly, adverb
Word Origin
C14: from Latin consonāns, from consonāre to sound at the same time, be in harmony, from sonāre to sound

Collins English Dictionary – Complete & Unabridged 2012 Digital Edition
© William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd. 1979, 1986 © HarperCollins
Publishers 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2012
Cite This Source
Word Origin and History for consonant Expand
n.
early 14c., "sound other than a vowel," from Latin consonantem (nominative consonans), present participle of consonare "to sound together, sound aloud," from com- "with" (see com-) + sonare "to sound" (see sonata). Consonants were thought of as sounds that are only produced together with vowels.

adj.
early 15c., from Old French consonant (13c.), from Latin consonantem (nominative consonans), present participle of consonare (see consonant (n.)).

Eight Election Words That Will Fit…
8 Ways to Say Congratulations!

The mystery words on your screen
Dear Mom: 5 Adjectives for Mother's…
Browse more topics on our blog

What Is the Difference Between Discreet and Discrete?
Learn the correct uses of these two commonly confused homophones.
What Character Was Removed from the Alphabet?
What mistaken pronunciation gave this character its name?
Apostrophes 101
This small mark has two primary uses: to signify possession or omitted letters.
How Do I Get a Word into the Dictionary?
People invent new words all the time, but which ones actually make it?
Word of the Day
comity

Difficulty index for consonant
Most English speakers likely know this word
Word Value for consonant

LikeLike

Reply ↓

SAM on June 8, 2016 at 12:01 am said:

see how they changed the wording/definitiion from COM SENT, to “CON” sent… and buried it within the text…com is stated as “within’, then reads as “con”
Etymology[edit]
Recorded in Middle English since circa 1225, from Old French consentir, from Latin cōnsentīre, present active infinitive of cōnsentiō ‎(“to feel together”),
***** itself from com- ‎(“with”) + sentiō ‎(“to feel”)*******
we all (k)now, CON, does not mean COM, “they” have AI/minions erasing everything.
com- Look up com- at Dictionary.com
word-forming element usually meaning “with, together,” from Latin com, archaic form of classical Latin cum “together, together with, in combination,” from PIE *kom- “beside, near, by, with” (compare Old English ge-, German ge-). The prefix in Latin sometimes was used as an intensive.

Before vowels and aspirates, reduced to co-; before -g-, assimilated to cog- or con-; before -l-, assimilated to col-; before -r-, assimilated to cor-; before -c-, -d-, -j-, -n-, -q-, -s-, -t-, -v- assimilated to con-.

LikeLike

Reply ↓

	Sean Robinett on LET THE ETERNAL PRESENCE …
	Sean Robinett on LET THE ETERNAL PRESENCE …
	Sean Robinett on LION GENERAL KUMARA : TO MY RA…
	GNIMOCAUHSEY on MICHAEL KAVANAGH : WHITE LIGHT…
	HATTER on SANAT : SILLY BOY BLUE –…
	fakie28 on MARS SUN AND VENUS – NAU…
	antoniatailor on LAVETTE : Alchemy Astrology An…
	gratzite on LAVETTE : Alchemy Astrology An…
	antoniatailor on LAVETTE : Alchemy Astrology An…
	gratzite on LAVETTE : Alchemy Astrology An…
	THOMASS on FAE FOLKE : ORIGINS OF THE GIA…
	fakie28 on INSPIRATION – POEM BY HA…
	fakie28 on WHAM : NATURA NATURANS QUANTUM…
	Marilee NiEtain on SOVEREIGN KI : WEAPON OF DECEP…
	Marilee NiEtain on SOVEREIGN KI : WEAPON OF DECEP…